Are high profile abused dogs a ‘brand’?
Most people have heard about the case of Patrick, the Pit Bull mix who was repeatedly abused by his owner, Kisha Curtis. In 2011, Curtis left Patrick tied to the railing of her apartment for a week, before shoving the emaciated dog into a plastic bag and throwing him down a trash chute. Patrick was rescued just moments before he would have been compacted with the building’s garbage.
This past Tuesday Curtis pled guilty to charges of animal abuse, clearing the way for her criminal trial to finally proceed. As part of her guilty plea, Curtis has also agreed to forfeiture of Patrick, something she had fought against until now. Essentially, she was not only pleading not guilty to the charges, but was also demanding the right to have Patrick returned to her.
Unbelievable, right? After all, why would someone who so obviously didn’t care about Patrick’s welfare fight so hard to get him back? For the answer to that, we need to follow the money, which we can do in this case by simply reading the sentence that Associated Humane Societies of New Jersey (AHS) used to describe Patrick when fighting a court battle for their own custody of him –
(Patrick is a) “very valuable brand for commercial exploitation and fundraising”
As Nathan Winograd so succinctly summed up Patrick’s custody battle –
It is expected that the court will also determine whether Patrick is given to the only “loving home” which he has ever truly known: the home of the veterinarians who saved his life and want to keep him or whether he will be given to the Associated Humane Societies of New Jersey (AHS), which has sued those veterinarians (and the City of Newark) to gain custody of Patrick so that they could continue to exploit his name for money.
AHS is claiming “ownership” of Patrick because it was to their clinic that Patrick was immediately rushed for emergency treatment after being pulled from the trash chute of Curtis’ New Jersey apartment building. Once stabilized, the dog (as yet un named) was transferred to Garden State Veterinary Services (GSVS) in Northern New Jersey. Since it was St. Patrick’s day weekend, staff at GSVS named him “Patrick”, hoping that the “luck of the Irish” would help the severely starved and dehydrated dog survive his injuries.
Patrick’s recovery has been nothing short of a miracle, and the Veterinarians and staff of GSVS have been responsible for that, spending hours nursing him back to health. As the only loving home Patrick has ever known, a GSVS Veterinary Nurse who particularly bonded with Patrick has long hoped that Patrick will be allowed to live out his life with her, as a family pet, once the court cases are over.
AHS, however, has other plans. They want “trademark registration number 23699″ (that’s how they refer to Patrick in their court documents) to be returned to them, so that he can live out his life at the AHS Forked River Shelter that shares property with the AHS Popcorn Park Zoo.
Their reasons? Denying AHS ownership will, in the words from their court documents, “deprive AHS of its property interest in Patrick”, resulting in “significant losses” of “economic advantage”.
In other words, ‘we won’t be able to keep using him to raise money’.
AHS believes that what’s in Patrick’s best interest is to spend his life essentially on display at their zoo shelter, where he can continue to operate as a fund raising cash cow, and to that end they are suing both the City of Newark and the GSVS veterinarian that saved Patrick’s life. In fact, by even writing about Patrick, myself and any other bloggers could be violating what AHS claims is their ‘intellectual property ownership’ of any stories, articles or images of or relating to Patrick (affectionately nicknamed “Trademarky Mark”, I’m willing to bet).
Figure above taken from Court Filing of Associated Humane Societies Inc. Vs City of Newark and Garden State Veterinary Services
Read Nathan Winograd’s excellent full story on the fight for control of Patrick here, and the Patrick Miracle Facebook page has a step by step break down of Patrick’s history and current status.
You tell me – where should Patrick be allowed to stay? Is he a “fund raising brand”, or an abused dog who deserves a chance at a new life?
WordPress
Google + 
Facebook
Are high profile abused dogs a "brand"? The fight over Patrick the Miracle Dog.
I am disgusted by their greed and total disregard for this dog’s best interests. It’s in the dog best interests to be part of a family, in a loving home. If the judge has any reason he will rule against these greedy jerks. Are they in this for the money or to help animals? Obviously they could care less about the animals. The money they are spending in legal fees to sue the veterinarians that nursed him back to health should be being used to benefit the other animals that need help. They disgust me.
Carol, the last two links aren't live for me.
This isn't the first time that something like this has happened, and the dog is the spoils of the warfare. Wasn't there some sort of custody battle over that morbidly obese dachshund? And in England someone gave up two elderly dogs that had been featured in a movie. The shelter that took them in made sure to exploit their fame, as if it had any significance at all.
that's weird…
http://www.nathanwinograd.com/?p=6919
and
https://www.facebook.com/notes/the-patrick-miracle/patricks-history-and-current-status-the-short-version/146433745426630
WP plug in for FB comments seems not to be playing nice with link placement.
Patrick needs to stay in his home.. so sue me!
Hmmm, there is a distinct smell of NAIA puppy millers on these comments.
Sure, because nothing says “puppy mill” like someone expressing concern over where an abused dog gets to live out his life.
I can’t even imagine a non profit being as clueless about public relations as AHS is. No cash cow Patrick is going to make up for the poor publicity they have gotten from this. Justice for Patrick should not include them or their popcorn zoo.
sadly arent there other dogs that they could use for this cause?..the more i learn about HSUS the less i like about them:(…now I am curious who benefited from the M. Vick dogs?
Snake pit alert.
Sad, isn't it JG…a responsible breeder who welcomes visitors to her facility and does breed rescue yet attracts all the usual humanewatch suspects.
Krista Prater Piles , HSUS has nothing to do with this case. It is not affiliated with local humane societies.
Poor dog. Stop playing politics with the dog and return it to where it is wanted and will get love. How cruel that he is being used as a pawn, for heavens sake put his interests first.
Interesting read about dog abuse and branding http://t.co/1LpGOyqWwp